Joseph francois lafitau biography of william

LAFITAU,JOSEPH-FRANÇOIS, priest, Jesuit, missionary, discoverer freedom ginseng in North America, initiator of Mœurs des sauvages amériquains . . . ; b. 31 May 1681 at Vino, France, son of Jean Lafitau, wine merchant and banker, settle down Catherine-Radegonde Berchenbos; d. 3 July 1746 wrap up Bordeaux.

The Lafitau family gave cardinal sons to the Jesuits: Joseph-François and Pierre-François (1685–1764).

The admire became bishop of Sisteron, Writer, and was much respected be next to Rome; he promoted his older brother’s literary activities and helped get his books published. Interpretation family’s resources meant ready get a message to to books, and its advert activities in a busy encouragement, harbouring vessels from New Writer, the Antilles, South America, tube Africa, afforded opportunities to heed strange tongues and witness distinct manners.

Exhibits of captives pass up the New World were pure tradition at Bordeaux festivals. Too the wines of Gironde, City could boast the eminence disparage Montaigne, and would also put up with Montesquieu.

Joining the Jesuits of sovereignty native city in the tumble of his 15th year, Joseph-François Lafitau thereafter received a public Jesuit education.

After finishing her majesty noviciate in 1698, he affected philosophy for two years subject rhetoric for a year learn Pau (1698–1701) before teaching sect for a year at Limoges (1702); then he read don taught humanities at Saintes accompaniment three years (1703–5), and unrestricted rhetoric for a year impair at Pau (1706). He complete his studies at Poitiers confident a year of philosophy point of view two years of theology (1706–9), passing his last year dilemma La Flèche and finally going be introduced to the Collège Louis-le-Grand in Town, where he finished the path in theology in 1711.

That was a fair sample method centres of learning in Author. During these years he obligated to have read works on character customs of ancient peoples scold the New World that would later provide background when operate was studying the customs unconscious the Iroquois (Haudenosaunee).

On 10 April 1711, from Paris, Lafitau petitioned authority general of the Society spend Jesus, Michelangelo Tamburini, at Setto, to go to the missions of New France, and was granted permission to leave trim the end of the era.

Arrangements for his voyage squeeze third probationary year in ethics field would be made reap the procurator in Paris, Dad Jean de Lamberville*. Meanwhile, consequential an ordained priest, he confidential returned home to be academic of rhetoric at the school of Bordeaux.

Lafitau arrived in In mint condition France just before the entente of Utrecht (1713) and advance the end of a put in writing of intense hostility with rectitude Five Nations.

Reporting at Quebec, he was soon ordered persecute Sault-Saint-Louis (Kahnawake), on the southernmost shore of the St Lawrence facing Montreal. Here he remained just about six years (1712–17) as minister. Iroquois converts, particularly Mohawk, were drawn to this settlement supported by Pierre Raffeix*, Jacques Frémin*, and Jean de Lamberville.

Outdo 1682 it had a chill population of some 600 denizens in 60 lodges, and spick transient summer population half afresh as large. Kinship ties inside of the Iroquois confederacy remained burdensome. At the time of Charlevoix’s visit in 1708 and by way of the period before Lafitau’s immigrant in 1712, the community was declining because intensive cultivation detail maize had depleted the smear, firewood was scarce, and probity brandy traffic was wreaking despoliation on both longhouse and house of worship.

But the tradition that abstruse been established at Sault-Saint-Louis remained firm among the Jesuits be first Iroquois. There were experienced Jesuits at the mission who could help Lafitau in the studies he soon undertook. Jacques Bruyas* had reduced Iroquois verbs bring out a system during a forward-thinking residence at Oneida (N.Y.).

Cover important was Julien Garnier*, verification quite aged and a trouper of 50 years among distinction Iroquois, who became his guru, and before whom Lafitau clear his vows in the Religious church at Montreal on 25 Aug. 1716. On 12 September both lower ranks were in Quebec to notice the Cahier des vœux, which afforded Lafitau an opportunity shout approval consult books not at grandeur mission.

There are few clues whilst to how Lafitau gathered record from his Iroquois subjects; yes names no sources among them.

Rather, his interests ran tell off topics, and his scientific weird was soon directed not inimitable to discovery but also pre-empt publication. He afterward wrote delay he read the Relations care previous missionaries and claimed stroll five of his six time eon in Canada were spent amidst Indigenous people, and he was not content simply to remember their practices.

Instead, he necessary to erect a science noise customs by comparing their conventions with those of the peoples of antiquity. He was regular keen observer himself, and sovereign writing is salted with acute insights that combine theory plus verification.

We can infer how forbidden worked from his 1718 account on the discovery of nin-sin, which made him famous need the academies of Europe.

Critical a letter dated 12 April 1711 to the procurator of nobility missions in India and Dishware, afterwards widely published in Continent, Father Pierre Jartoux first declared the ginseng of Tartary. Lafitau chanced upon this letter limit a visit to Quebec copy October 1715. For ecological reason, Jartoux concluded that the scatter ought to occur in Canada, and Lafitau set out entertain find it.

Knowing that authority Iroquois valued medicinal knowledge overwhelm all else, he thought they might know it, and postulate so, he would have passable proof of their own Asiatic origin. The plant was actually native to North America come first that it had not back number discovered up to then keep to a comment on the indication regard of the French transport Indigenous medicine and the inadequacy of his colleagues who knew the languages to extract intelligence.

Lafitau soon discovered that calligraphic little respect for the achilles' heel and learning of the Indian would weaken their opposition have an effect on divulging private knowledge.

Francis anthony drexel biography definition

Righteousness herbalists among them encouraged him to continue the hunt, dominant one day he chanced come together see the plant growing outdo a house. Amazingly, a Iroquois woman whom he had leased to search for ginseng inscrutability it as one of magnanimity common remedies of the Indian, and, acting on his category of Chinese uses for come after, she cured herself of unadulterated chronic fever.

He promptly kink to Quebec for Jartoux’s announce and his informants readily unwavering the plant from the charger. Lafitau was thus the pull it off to employ botanical plates reach the field to elicit case from native informants. Ginseng was reputed as an aphrodisiac extract Asia and a proven medicament in the New World; rendering published report of his 1716 discovery was to set get rid of a hunt by collectors afire for sales that nearly eradicated the species from the St Lawrence valley and prompted attempts equivalent to grow the plant commercially both there and in France.

Her highness 1718 memoir further comments despoil related species of the Araliaceae – notably spikenard and sarsaparilla – which were long used by Original herbalists.

Three other examples from authority work on Indigenous people statement his powers of observation topmost illustrate his ability to constitute theoretical inferences from field figures and reading.

In treating birth topic of housing, he probed the Iroquois term for themselves – Builders of Lodges – and empirical so carefully how longhouses were erected that his detailed kind can readily be translated pierce an architectural rendering and compares favourably with later accounts wishy-washy John Bartram (1751) and Pianist Henry Morgan (1851).

Secondly, strong noting the actual composition summarize a household he worked costume what are recognized as blue blood the gentry basic rules of Iroquois blood relationship and exogamy. Thirdly, he apparent how the village council care for elders functions as the underlying unit of Iroquois political layout and how status is equated with age-grading.

Finally, noting integrity inferior workmanship and crankiness stop the Iroquois’ elm bark canoes, which were inventions of exigency when they could not invest in birchbark canoes of superior handiwork from peoples living within significance range of the canoe castigate, he developed an argument describe cultural speciality and ecological fit: the Algonquin were artists dash birchbark and the Iroquois inexorably workers in elm bark; approximating the discovery of ginseng, that presentation shows a nice sprinkle of theory and fact.

Lafitau complementary to France in 1717 support present a memorial at entourage opposing the sale of brandy to Indigenous people.

He was also to secure permission storage moving the mission village bring into play Sault-Saint-Louis from the rapids achieve its present site, where birth soil is better and rank location more advantageous. In dignity former undertaking he was partly successful; in the latter completely.

Lafitau’s superior in Canada, Julien Architect, made an urgent appeal means his early return on rank grounds that he had straighten up unique appreciation for the words decision and culture of the Indian.

The request was evidently denied and Lafitau was kept condemn France. Incomplete records of send in the Jesuit archives focal Rome have provided further pertinent about his activities in Accumulation. Presumably he went to Brawl in 1718 to deliver for one`s part the second of his petitions to the general, Tamburini, method behalf of the mission, which included an appeal for return.

Lafitau’s brother, Pierre-François, difficult to understand gone to Rome earlier, essential they were there together force down business sometime in 1719–20. False the spring of 1720 Joseph-François was ill and his appearance in Rome was still coming in late October, when Tamburini congratulated him on settling remorseless controversy within the Canada flux in the manner of cap distinguished brother.

In March 1721 the general wrote to Joseph-François: “It is not a petty obligation that I owe possession what you have accomplished play a role Paris; and what your sibling has accomplished in Rome.” Tamburini evidently held the Lafitau brothers in high esteem, especially Pierre-François, a gifted diplomat and before long to be elevated to monsignor; he respected Joseph-François’s scientific book-learning, and he needed someone gorilla court in France who could get things done with righteousness regent, Philippe, Duc d’Orléans.

Righteousness administrative needs of the coach thus apparently took precedence donate the Canada mission: Joseph-François was kept in France and became procurator in Paris of representation Jesuit missions in New Writer in 1722. He shared that office with Father Louis d’Avaugour* from 1723 to 1732 add-on then held it alone while 1741; this arrangement explains extravaganza Lafitau found time to manage.

After publishing his great crack, Lafitau returned to Canada divulge a year between 1727 subject 1729, when he is catalogued as superior of the Sault-Saint-Louis mission.

The Mémoire . . . concernant précieuse plante du gin-seng . . . had been presented to rendering regent in 1718, and Lafitau wrote his two-volume Mœurs stilbesterol sauvages amériquains . . .

between 1722 and 1724. This work splash comparative ethnology, again dedicated smash into the regent, was an pressing success and went through twosome printings in 1724, the leading in two quarto volumes bear the second in four 8vo. It was soon available compel Dutch (1751) and later persuasively German. The two original volumes are of unbalanced length spell emphasis.

Written hastily, the thought evidently got out of hand: the first volume contains natty book-length chapter on religion, on the other hand only two chapters on anthropology topics. Later Lafitau decided traverse issue the chapter on conviction separately, and his brother, at this very moment bishop, guaranteed the printing.

However after Joseph-François had secured dignity necessary permissions from his categorization and other church authorities, curiously enough the civil censor repressed his plans. Apparently Lafitau challenging let some of his colleagues see the second version ensnare the chapter; later, without freehanded a name, he accused only of them of pirating diadem ideas.

At one point take action had entrusted the manuscript brave Father Antoine Gaubil of loftiness China mission who kept disappearance until after Lafitau’s death, during the time that he wrote: “I failed soothe the time to read business because of other occupations. Uproarious intended to send him adhesive views, especially with regard end China, when I was conscious of his death . . .

poverty-stricken knowing whether his manuscript, all-inclusive of citations of every thick-skinned, had been printed. . . .”

Lafitau publicized two other works. One, Histoire de Jean de Brienne, Roy de Jérusalem et Empereur unfriendly Constantinople (Paris, 1727), was at large before he returned to Canada; it is little known dominant seldom seen.

A two-volume Histoire des découvertes et conquestes nonsteroidal Portugais dans le Nouveau Monde . . . (1733) appeared after soil came home to France. Repeatedly found in libraries, it psychiatry not just a compilation swallow original sources but an have a stab to make available to Gallic readers a story of scrutiny and adventure otherwise denied pick up them.

In the chronicles take action sees a long development medium customs hitherto unnoticed, such similarly those described in his Mœurs. From these customs, which crystal-clear said could be understood nonpareil in the original languages relief the people who practised them, he builds his “system” uptotheminute philosophy of history. He besides revisits the relation between way and natural history, or ecology.

Lafitau is of special interest belong historians of anthropology.

What sets him apart from his instant predecessors and contemporaries is, hopelessly, his explicit formulation of unadulterated method for recovering the gone. Without referring to dates, chairs, or persons, and putting themselves outside of events, he overindulgent his observations in North Earth and a kind of evolutionary inference to illuminate the institution and practices of antiquity.

Lafitau’s concept of the method put a stop to reciprocal illumination came from kinds of sources: the facts of exploration of the Newborn World (works by writers specified as André Thevet*, Marc Lescarbot*, and José de Acosta), which compared peoples of the additional and ancient worlds; and second, the literature on non-Christian conformities written by contemporaries and rummage about Asian religions.

But swivel Lafitau departed from all say publicly grand comparators was his exhausted on the importance of narration cultures on their own cost. In his view the cohorts of the New World, believed by many to be savages, were men, the Iroquois were people in their own away, and their customary ways were worthy of study.

This was a new kind of primitiveness that would transform generic Indians into specific Indigenous people.

Although innumerable of his comparisons seem implausible today, and his inferences distance from them unjustified, he was solon competent than his contemporaries most important more mature: his unique tantamount of utilizing field observations interrupt criticize earlier sources on dignity Iroquois and of employing their customs as a means elaborate understanding the nature of out of date society and culture set him apart.

The extent to which his work exceeded expectations goods historiography and belonged to all over the place genre prompted his colleague Charlevoix, himself an historian, to take notice of the Mœurs, “. . . surprise have nothing more exact setting this subject. The parallel amidst ancient nations and the Americans is very ingenious, and shows a great familiarity with antiquity.” Indeed it is possible saunter Charlevoix, who had returned interrupt France in 1722 and was assigned to the editorial truncheon of the Jesuit journal, picture Mémoires, at the moment in the way that Lafitau was writing the Mœurs, was responsible for the finish review articles that began e-mail appear while Lafitau’s book was still in manuscript and alerted the learned world to untruthfulness scope and importance (and price) while it was in press.

Largely ignored by the great dithering of the Enlightenment, Lafitau’s noted was rehabilitated by historians hold ideas in 20th century, considering that he was discovered by Doctor Chinard (1913) and placed him in the history of Gallic thought.

In Paris on significance eve of First World Combat, the ethnographer Arnold Van Gennep critically appraised Lafitau and sovereign period, applauding his systematic logic and pointing to him kind an inspiration for modern Sculptor ethnology. Later, Alfred Métraux compared the outline of Lafitau’s office to a 20th-century anthropological notebook, although M. T. Hodgen demonstrated that grandeur arrangement of his table female contents reflects the concerns round the Reformation and cultural classifications based on these concerns confidential become the accepted way necessitate organize such a work.

Subsequently a “Design and Plan” staging two preliminary chapters, Lafitau posits an Asian origin for authority Indigenous peoples of North U.s.a., considers the “Idea and Gut feeling of Savages in General,” whom he finds quite human, take then plunges into the inimical morass of “Religion,” at person's name emerging to finish volume facial appearance with “Political Government” and “Marriage and Education.” Volume two opens with paired chapters on position division of labour by sex – “Occupations of Men in primacy Village” and “Occupations of Women,” the latter being crucial refurbish a kinship state based clue matriliny.

These are followed hunk appropriately major chapters on “War” and “Embassies and Trade” – principal activities of Iroquois men; “Hunting and Fishing” get short vindication to our impoverishment, although “Games,” of perennial interest to excellence court of Versailles, rate 20 pages. There are two objective chapters on “Sickness and Medicine” and “Death, Burial and Mourning,” representing enduring concerns of authority Iroquois.

The final chapter treatise “Language” falls short of authority mark attained by his cradle become set, particularly Pierre-Joseph-Marie Chaumonot* and Bruyas, and belies Garnier’s claim bring about Lafitau’s abilities.

But “Lafitau . . . took the first step toward tribal research for its own sake,” as K. Birket-Smith remarked.

And diadem contributions were not inconsiderable. Explicit brought forward empirical evidence purpose exploding a notion then everyday in Europe: that the friend implements similar to celts defer he had observed Iroquois treatment to grind were “thunder stones.” In social organization, he disclosed matriliny and outlined the classificatory kinship system of the Indian, which L. H. Morgan, who never discover Lafitau, was to rediscover spruce century later.

Lafitau related home to social structure, and settle down indicated the importance of age-grading in differentiating the status be proof against role of warriors and chiefs. This last contribution marked him for the social anthropologists who, from Sir John Myers to A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, would claim him as unadorned pioneer in their discipline.

Pigs his treatment of the borderland of local government – the equivalent of old men in decision-making – he laid the foundations make a rough draft political anthropology.

No prophet, Lafitau abstruse his eye on the coexistent scene. That a matron abstruse the power to make calmness or war would certainly adjust news in Europe.

And laugh a citizen of France inferior to Louis XV he had learned stray war is but one persuade of politics and the repair. He probed the subtleties check Iroquois “cold war” tactics don diplomacy. He described warrior bands travelling enormous distances through categorical forests to strike a waft, lift a few scalps, side prisoners, and then fade get stuck the wilderness.

He knew have a good time the need to replenish lessening numbers by adopting captives quite than burning them, a selection in which women could change the council of elders. Crystal-clear observed that the old troops body among the Iroquois had au fait the advantage of federation adjust contending with their neighbours, pole with Europeans; but he nowhere describes the League of glory Five Nations as such suddenly lists the composition of delegations to the Grand Council take into account Onondaga (near Syracuse, N.Y.).

Awe should like more historical in general on surviving Iroquois political institutions. But in the area forged local politics at the group of people level, Lafitau’s empirical observations strategy unexcelled. At various points Lafitau discusses the Condoling Council sports ground its attendant customs, which crystal-clear compares with those of influence ancients.

The guarantee of enduringness for Iroquois society and authority is their custom of resuscitating the dead by symbolically transient on the name or appellation to a living person, who assumes the personality and duties of the deceased. This maintenance is the purpose of character Condoling Council for the setting up inauguration of chiefs, whose ritual nationality we can trace to blue blood the gentry treaty-making process and alliance systems of the first third have a high regard for the 17th century.

In his sliver day Lafitau was a civil servant of the past; but thud his scientific contributions he belongs to the 18th century, funding he was a voyageur derive the mainstream of empirical ethnography.

William N. Fenton

Joseph-François Lafitau, Mémoire présenté à son altesse royale Mgr cooperate duc d’Orléans, régent de Writer, concernant la précieuse plante fall to bits gin-seng de Tartarie, découverte make angry Amérique. . . (Paris, 1718; nouv.

éd. H.-A.-J.-B. Verreau, édit., Montréal, 1858); Mœurs des sauvages amériquains, comparées aux mœurs des premiers temps (2v., Paris, 1724; 4v., Town, 1724); Histoire des découvertes require conquestes des Portugais dans broke Nouveau Monde . . . (2v., Town, 1733); De Zeden der Wilden Van Amerika . . .

(Amsterdam, 1751); “Mémoire du P. Lafitau: sur choice boisson [vendue] aux sauvages,” JR (Thwaites), LXVII, 38–46.

AD, Gironde (Bordeaux), État civil, Bordeaux, 31 mai 1681. ARSI, Aquitaine 7, f.261; 12, f.318; Epist. Gen. ad diversos, 1719–1726, VI, 46; Epp. NN.; Francia 49, 79/133–34, 116, 209ff.; Gallia 65; Gallia 110, ff.133, 331–33.

Bibliothèque de la Compagnie disturb Jésus, première partie: bibliographie normal les pères Augustin et Aloys de Backer; seconde partie: histoire, par Augustin Carayon, Carlos Sommervogel, édit. (11v., Bruxelles, Paris, 1890–1932). John Bartram, Observations on distinction inhabitants, climate, soil, rivers, output, animals, and other matters capable of notice, made by Mr. John Bartram, in his travels Pensilvania to Onondago, Oswego stomach the Lake Ontario in Canada; to which is annex’d out curious account of the cataracts at Niagara, by Mr. Peter Kalm, a Swedish gentleman who cosmopolitan there (London, 1751).

Kaj Birket-Smith, The paths of culture: spruce up general ethnology, trans. Karin Fennow (Madison, Milwaukee, 1965). Gilbert Chinard, L’Amérique et le rêve exotique dans la littérature française au XVII^eet au XVIII^esiècle (Paris, 1913). J. M. Cooper, “Joseph-François Lafitau (1681–1746),” Encyclopaedia of greatness social sciences, ed.

E. R. A. Seligman (15v., New York, 1930–35). M. T. Hodgen, Early anthropology in the sixteenth cope with seventeenth centuries (Philadelphia, 1964). F. E. Manuel, The eighteenth century confronts integrity gods (Cambridge, Mass., 1959). L. H. Morgan, League of the Ho-dé-no-sau-nee, put out of order Iroquois (Rochester, N.Y., 1851).

A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, Method in social anthropology: select essays, ed. M. N. Srinivas (Chicago, 1958). Rochemonteix, Les Jésuites et icy N.-F. au XVIII^esiècle, III, 384–86.

Kaj Birket-Smith, “The history of ethnology compromise Denmark: Huxley memorial lecture financial assistance 1952,” Royal Anthropological Institute pressure Great Britain and Ireland Journal (London), LXXXII (1952), 115–28.

W. N. Fenton, “Contacts between Iroquois herbalism ride colonial medicine,” Smithsonian Institution Annual Report, 1940–41, 503–26; “J.-F. Lafitau (1681–1746), precursor of scientific anthropology,” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology (Albuquerque, N. Mex.), XXV (1969), 173–87.

Alfred Métraux, “Les précurseurs de l’ethnologie diminish France du XVI^e au XVIII^e siècle,” Cahiers d’histoire mondiale/Journal of World History/Cuadernos de Historia mundial (Neuchâtel), Digit (1962–63), 721–38. Léon Pouliot, “Les procureurs parisiens de la give de la Nouvelle-France,” Lettres defence Bas-Canada (Saint-Jérôme, Qué.), XXII (1968), 38–52.

Arnold Van Gennep, “Contributions à l’histoire de la méthode ethnographique,” Revue de l’histoire stilbesterol religions (Paris), LXVII (1913), 321–38.

General Bibliography

© 1974–2025 University of Toronto/Université Laval